Diastasis Recti
Post Natal Considerations: What is Diastasis Recti?
What is Diastasis Recti Abdominus?
1. Pathology & Mechanism
– Increased intraabdominal pressure results in
separation of Rectus Abdominus musculature at the linea alba.
-Linea Alba = Connective tissue that runs superior to inferior from
xiphoid process to pubic symphysis. Laterally approximates the rectus abdominus and
abdominal musculature.
Abdominal Anatomy & Physiology
What is the DRA (Diastasis Recti Abdominus) Anatomy?
-
Separation of Rectus Abdominus due to linea alba stretching.
-
Effects the functionality of core.
-
Lack of deep abdominal stability
-
Lack of muscular coordination of core muscles due to structural changes (Diaphragm, pelvic floor, TA, lumbar multifidi)
“The Core” = Hydraulic Amplifier
Our functional core is compromised of:
-
Diaphragm
-
Transverse Abdominus
-
Lumbar Multifidi
-
Pelvic Floor
***These four muscle groups must work in synchrony to maintain
proper IAP (intraabdominal pressure). ***
Function of “Core” is to maintain IAP, stabilize spine, and
internal organs.
When IAP is not balanced, dysfunction can occur:
-
Urinary Incontinence
-
Back Pain
Common Populations That Experience Diastasis Recti Abdominus (DRA)
1. Post-natal women
2. Athletes (weight lifters, military service
members)
3. Individuals whom BMI is in the category of Obese
Symptoms of Diastasis Recti
1. Bloated, “Pregnant” Belly appearance
2. Back Pain
3. Urinary Incontinence
4. Feeling “unsupported” or “unstable” in
abdomen.
Incidence of Diastasis Recti
1. ***More common in multiparous women (2 or
more pregnancies).
2. Age >33 y.o.
3. Large Baby
4. Greater Weight Gain
5. C-section birth
6. *Women who completed heavy lifting > 20x week
→ 2x increased risk of DRA
Prevalence of DRA
21 weeks= 33.1%
6 weeks post partum= 60%
6 months postpartum= 45.4%
12 months postpartum= 32.6%
Diagnosis of Diastasis Recti
Diagnosis is made by finger width distance between the 2 rectus abdominus muscle bellies at approximatley 4.5 cm above the umbilicus and below.
Special Tests:
1. Head Lift Test
2. Active SLR
Some research says that > or = 2 fingers width separation indicates a clinical Diastasis Recti
However, my training is that > or = 1 finger width separation is clinically significant and can cause functional limitations.
Treatment of Diastasis Recti
Physical Therapy Treatment:
Manual Therapy (Hands-On Treatment):
-
Myofascial release to structures creating pull on rectus abdominus and may be keeping separation.
-
Thoracolumbar fascia
-
Hamstrings
-
C- secttion scar mobilization
-
Visceral= mesentery, jejeunoilium, uterus, ovaries
-
KT tape to approxiimate the DRA
Neuromuscular Re-Education
-
Diaphragmatic breathing full circumference→ focus on posterior rib cage breathing
-
Pelvic Tilts, Pelvic Clocks
-
Pelvic Floor strength in all positions anti gravity and against gravity.
-
Bracing
*Abdominal brace use as recommended by Physician.
Movement Contraindications
**With guided “core” strengthening and PT treatment as indicated, individuals with DRA should be able to return to all premorbid exercises.
However, there are movement contradications until the abdominal wall integrity is restored.
1. Crunches
2. Exercises while laying on back with both legs in the air.
3. Heavy Lifting
4. Planks→ intiially
Focus of DRA Exercise Programs
1. Promoting Approximation of Rectus Abdominus by avoiding overuse of Rectus Abdominus
2. Strengthen Transverse Abdominus ot facility approximation of Rectus Abdominus
3. Ensure “Core” is functioning in synchrony (Diaphragm, TA, Pelvic Floor, Lumbar Multifidi)
4. Address other postural, musculoskeletal impairments (hamstring Tightness, thoracolumbar fascia tightness, forward head posturing)
Pilates Rehabilitation Protocol- Diastasis Recti
1. Diaphragmatic Breathing → focus on posterior rib cage
2. Pelvic Tilts
3. Bent Knee Opening
4. Pelvic Clocks
5. Supine Arm arcs with Theraband
6. Footwork on Reformer with Franklin Balls at midline
7. Bridging with Franklin Balls at midline
8. Quadruped on Reformer
8. Sidelying Footwork on Reformer
9. Sidelying in Spine Corrector on Reformer- Feet
in straps
10. Sidelying Thoracic Rotation on Reformer
11. Seated Rowing for posture
12. Seated Footwork on Reformer
13. Standing Hip Stretch on Reformer
Other Non-Pilates Exercises & Info
1. General lower extremity stretching
2. Neutral Spine Exercises
3. Safe Thoracic Spine Rotation
4. Upper Trap & Levator Scapulae Stretch
Cues:
Focus on pelvic floor engagement and relaxation paired with deep transverse abdominus engagement in all positions. (First anti-gravity → against gravity)
Any Questions? Thank you!
melanie@inspiraphysicaltherapy.com
929-295-6566
References
1. Venes D, Taber CW. Taber’s cyclopedic medical dictionary. 20 edn Philadelphia: Davis, 2005. [Google Scholar]
2. 2. Spitznagle TM, Leong FC, Van Dillen LR. Prevalence of diastasis recti abdominis in a urogynecological patient population. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2007;18:321–8. 10.1007/s00192-006-0143-5 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
3. 3. Lockwood T. Rectus muscle diastasis in males: primary indication for endoscopically assisted abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;101:1685–91; discussion 92–4 10.1097/00006534-199805000-00042 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
4. 4. Palanivelu C, Rangarajan M, Jategaonkar PA, et al. Laparoscopic repair of diastasis recti using the ‘Venetian blinds’ technique of plication with prosthetic reinforcement: a retrospective study. Hernia 2009;13:287–92. 10.1007/ s10029-008-0464-z [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. 5. Mota P, Pascoal AG, Carita AI, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of diastasis recti abdominis from late pregnancy to 6 months postpartum, and relationship with lumbo-pelvic pain. Man Ther 2015;20:200–5. 10.1016/j.math.2014.09.002 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
6. 6. Boissonnault JS, Blaschak MJ. Incidence of diastasis recti abdominis during the childbearing year. Phys Ther 1988;68:1082–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. 7. Bursch SG. Interrater reliability of diastasis recti abdominis measurement. Phys Ther 1987;67:1077–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. 8. Candido G, Lo T, Janssen PA. Risk factors for diastasis of the recti abdominis. J Assoc Chart Physiother Womens Health 2005;97:49–54. [Google Scholar]
References Continued
1. 9. Turan V, Colluoglu C, Turkyilmaz E, et al. Prevalence of diastasis recti abdominis in the population of young multiparous adults in Turkey. Ginekol Pol 2011;82:817–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. 10. Lo T, Candido G, Janssen P. Diastasis of the recti abdominis in pregnancy: risk factors and treatment. Physiother Can 1999;51:32. [Google Scholar]
3. 11. Rett MT, Braga MD, Bernardes NO, et al. Prevalence of diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles immediately postpartum: comparison between primiparae and multiparae. Rev Bras De Fisioterapia 2009;13:275–80. 10.1590/s1413-35552009005000037 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
4. 12. Boissonnault JS, Kotarinos KR. Diastasis recti I. In: Wilder E, editor. ed. Obstetric and gynecologic physical therapy. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1988:63–81. [Google Scholar]
5. 13. Noble E. Essential exercises for the childbearing year: a guide to health and comfort before and after your baby is born. 4th edn Harwich: New Life Images, 1995:81–106. [Google Scholar]
6. 14. Parker MA, Millar AL, Dugan SA. Diastasis rectus abdominis and lumbo-pelvic pain and dysfunction—are they related? J Womens Health Phys Ther 2009;33:15–22. 10.1097/01274882-200933020-00003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
7. 15. Benjamin DR, van de Water AT, Peiris CL. Effects of exercise on diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscle in the antenatal and postnatal periods: a systematic review. Physiotherapy 2014;100:1–8. 10.1016/j.physio.2013.08.005 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
8. 16. Hilde G, Staer-Jensen J, Ellstrom Engh M, et al. Continence and pelvic floor status in nulliparous women at midterm pregnancy. Int Urogynecol J 2012;23:1257–63. 10.1007/s00192-012-1716-0 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
9. 17. Staer-Jensen J, Siafarikas F, Hilde G, et al. Postpartum recovery of levator hiatus and bladder neck mobility in relation to pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2015;125:531–9. 10.1097/AOG. 0000000000000645 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
10. 18. Hilde G, Staer-Jensen J, Siafarikas F, et al. Postpartum pelvic floor muscle training and urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:1231–8. 10.1097/AOG. 0000000000000012 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
11. 19. Stær-Jensen J, Siafarikas F, Hilde G, et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of pelvic organ support during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122(Pt 1):329–36. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318299f62c [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
12. 20. Mota P, Pascoal AG, Sancho F, et al. Reliability of the inter-rectus distance measured by palpation. Comparison of palpation and ultrasound measurements. Man Ther 2013;18:294–8. 10.1016/j.math. 2012.10.013 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
13. 21. Beighton P, Solomon L, Soskolne CL. Articular mobility in an African population. Ann Rheum Dis 1973;32:413–18. 10.1136/ard.32.5.413 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
References Cont’d
1. 22. Boyle KL, Witt P, Riegger-Krugh C. Intrarater and interrater reliability of the Beighton and Horan Joint Mobility Index. J Athl Train 2003;38:281–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. 23. Bulbena A, Duro JC, Porta M, et al. Clinical assessment of hypermobility of joints: assembling criteria. J Rheumatol 1992;19:115–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3. 24. Junge T, Jespersen E, Wedderkopp N, et al. Inter-tester reproducibility and inter-method agreement of two variations of the Beighton test for determining generalised joint hypermobility in primary school children. BMC Pediatr 2013;13:214 10.1186/1471-2431-13-214 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
4. 25. Quatman CE, Ford KR, Myer GD, et al. The effects of gender and pubertal status on generalized joint laxity in young athletes. J Sci Med Sport 2008;11:257–63. 10.1016/ j.jsams.2007.05.005 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. 26. van der Giessen LJ, Liekens D, Rutgers KJ, et al. Validation of Beighton score and prevalence of connective tissue signs in 773 Dutch children. J Rheumatol 2001;28:2726–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. 27. Albert HB, Godskesen M, Westergaard JG. Incidence of four syndromes of pregnancy-related pelvic joint pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27:2831–4. 10.1097/00007632-200212150-00020 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
7. 28. Akram J, Matzen SH. Rectus abdominis diastasis. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2014;48:163–9. 10.3109/2000656X.2013.859145 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
8. 29. Chiarello CM, McAuley JA. Concurrent validity of calipers and ultrasound imaging to measure interrecti distance. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2013;43:495–503. 10.2519/jospt. 2013.4449 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
9. 30. Barbosa S, de Sa RA, Coca Velarde LG. Diastasis of rectus abdominis in the immediate puerperium: correlation between imaging diagnosis and clinical examination. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013;288:299–303. 10.1007/s00404-013-2725-z [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
10. 31. Pascoal AG, Dionisio S, Cordeiro F, et al. Inter-rectus distance in postpartum women can be reduced by isometric contraction of the abdominal muscles: a preliminary case- control study. Physiotherapy 2014;100:344–8. 10.1016/j.physio.2013.11.006 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
11. 32. Gilleard WL, Brown JM. Structure and function of the abdominal muscles in primigravid subjects during pregnancy and the immediate postbirth period. Phys Ther 1996;76:750–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
References Cont’d
1. 33. Chiarello CM, Falzone LA, McCaslin KE, et al. The effects of an exercise program on diastasis recti abdominis in pregnant women. J Womens Health Phys Ther 2005;29:11–16. 10.1097/01274882-200529010-00003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
2. 34. Laake P, Olsen BR, Benestad HB. Forskning i medisin og biofag. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk, 2008:264–5. [Google Scholar]
3. 35. Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, et al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007;39:1423–34. 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180616b27 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
4. 36. Stark B, Emanuelsson P, Gunnarsson U, et al. Validation of Biodex system 4 for measuring the strength of muscles in patients with rectus diastasis. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2012;46:102–5. 10.3109/2000656X.2011.644707 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. 37. Boxer S, Jones S. Intra-rater reliability of rectus abdominis diastasis measurement using dial calipers. Aust J Physiother 1997;43:109–14. 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60405-0 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
6. 38. Dalal K, Kaur A, Mitra M. Correlation between diastasis rectus abdominis and lumbopelvic pain and dysfunction. Indian J Physiother Occup Ther 2014;8:210–14. 10.5958/j.0973-5674.8.1.040 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
7. 39. Mota P, Pascoal AG, Sancho F, et al. Test-retest and intrarater reliability of 2-dimensional ultrasound measurements of distance between rectus abdominis in women. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012;42:940–6. 10.2519/jospt.2012.4115 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
8. 40. van de Water AT, Benjamin DR. Measurement methods to assess diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscle (DRAM): a systematic review of their measurement properties and meta-analytic reliability generalisation. Man Ther 2016;21:41–53. 10.1016/j.math.2015.09.013 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
9. 41. Keeler J, Albrecht M, Eberhardt L, et al. Diastasis recti abdominis: a survey of women’s health specialists for current physical therapy clinical practice for postpartum women. J Womens Health Phys Therapy 2012;36:131–42. 10.1097/JWH.0b013e318276f35f [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
10. 42. Vleeming A, Albert HB, Ostgaard HC, et al. European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain. Eur Spine J 2008;17:794–819. 10.1007/s00586-008-0602-4 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
11. 43. Shephard RJ, Aoyagi Y. Measurement of human energy expenditure, with particular reference to field studies: an historical perspective. Eur J Appl Physiol 2012;112:2785–815. 10.1007/ s00421-011-2268-6 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
12. 44. Sallis JF, Saelens BE. Assessment of physical activity by self-report: status, limitations, and future directions. Res Q Exerc Sport 2000;71(2 Suppl):S1–14. 10.1080/02701367.2000.11082780 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
13. Magnus P, Irgens LM, Haug K, et al. Cohort profile: the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa). Int J Epidemiol 2006;35:1146–50.
Other References